Page 4 - hypertension_newsletter3
P. 4

REFLECTIONS                                                                                  rtensio n
Hypertension Global Newsletter #3                                                                                                                     Hype
                                                                                                                                                          n oisnetr
       CLINICAL PEARLS FROM THE FACULTY   It is not yet known whether the management of hypertensioHny,pe
                                          including treatment goals, and choice and dosages of
            WATCH                         antihypertensive drugs, should be managed differently in men
            PROF. TSABEDZE DISCUSS HIS    and women. The authors suggest that future clinical studies
            THOUGHTS ON THE SIGNIFICANCE  should explore several sex-related differences, including:
            OF THE ESC STATEMENT ON
            SEX DIFFERENCES TO               • Better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of
            CLINICAL PRACTICE                  the BP increase in midlife to provide targets for improved
           CLICK HERE                          prevention of hypertension in both sexes
           FOR THE LINK TO FULL ARTICLE
                                             • Better integration of sex differences in risk assessment tools
                                               to improve CVD prevention

                                             • Identifying underlying mechanisms for sex differences in
                                               HMOD for better targets to reduce high-risk phenotypes and
                                               progression to CVD

                                             • Explore if different diagnostic BP threshold values or
                                               treatment targets may improve CVD prevention

                                             • Examine and communicate sex differences in the efficacy
                                               and adverse effects of antihypertensive treatment to
                                               optimize therapy

Orthostatic hypotension and mortality risk in geriatric outpatients: The impact of
duration and magnitude of the blood pressure drop.

Wiersinga JHI, et al. J Hypertens. 2022 Jun 1;40(6):1107-1114.

Orthostatic hypotension, a drop in BP after standing up, is a common condition affecting older persons (10–35%) and is associated
with an increased mortality risk. This observational prospective cohort study aimed to investigate the prevalence and magnitude of
orthostatic hypotension and determine its association with mortality in a geriatric outpatient population of 1240 patients (mean age
79.4 ± 6.9 years, 52.6% women).

Definitions                               Criteria

Orthostatic hypotension                   Drop in SBP =20 mm Hg and/or DBP =10 mm Hg
  Early orthostatic hypotension           Only at 1 min of standing up
  Delayed orthostatic hypotension         Only at 3 min of standing up
  Prolonged orthostatic hypotension       At both 1 and 3 min

Note: Groups with delayed and prolonged orthostatic hypertension were combined for analysis

The prevalence of orthostatic hypotension in this population was consistent with previous literature, 34.9% (11.9% of patients with
early orthostatic hypotension [EOH] and 23% with delayed or prolonged orthostatic hypotension [DPOH]). After a median (range)
follow-up of 1.9 (IQR 1.0–3.1) years, 22% of patients died. DPOH was associated with a higher mortality risk (age- and sex-adjusted
HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.28–2.22), whereas EOH was not associated with mortality risk. A subanalysis of geriatric patients with deficits,
such as physical impairment, cognitive impairment, malnutrition, and depressive symptoms, did not reveal a difference in the
association with mortality risk.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9